East Maui Water Rights Dispute Delayed: BLNR Defers Decision For Six Months

·2 min read

The Board of Land and Natural Resources (BLNR) has deferred a decision on the contested case hearing concerning the East Maui water license, impacting potential water diversion from the Koʻolau Forest Reserve. This delay of six months allows for further stakeholder discussions and could significantly affect agricultural operations and development plans.

Stunning aerial view of vibrant turquoise waters capturing natural beauty and tranquility.
Photo by Jeremy Bishop

The future of East Maui's water resources remains uncertain as the Board of Land and Natural Resources (BLNR) has decided to postpone its decision on the contentious issue of water rights. According to Maui Now's recent report, the BLNR voted to defer making a decision for six months following a public comment period. The decision regards a recommendation to hold a contested case hearing concerning the disposition of a water license. The potential outcomes include a public auction or a governor’s executive order, which would give the County of Maui control over the water diversion from the Koʻolau Forest Reserve.

This delay impacts several stakeholders, particularly businesses reliant on East Maui’s water. The decision hinges on whether the state will approve a 30-year water license by public auction or grant the county control via a governor’s executive order. Hawaii News Now noted that the County of Maui, native Hawaiian organizations, and environmental groups have been working to block control of a major water system from being given to Mahi Pono, the largest agricultural company on the island. This decision is critical, considering Mahi Pono owns 40,000 acres of former sugar land that rely on the water.

The debate over East Maui water rights has been ongoing for years, with various parties advocating for different approaches to water management. Civil Beat reported that stakeholders such as taro farmers, cultural practitioners, and environmental advocates are pushing for public control of the resource. This differs from Mahi Pono's desire for a long-term lease. The BLNR's decision to defer reflects the complexity of the issue, the multiple interests involved, and the need for a solution that considers both economic and environmental factors.

The deferral provides an opportunity for stakeholders to reach agreements. Board members specifically mentioned that they want to hear back from the involved parties on any progress toward a resolution before revisiting the issue. The ultimate decision will have substantial impacts on business operations in the region.

Related Articles