The University of Hawaii's proposition to use $5 million in public funds to compensate its student-athletes is stirring controversy, raising concerns about financial equity and adherence to federal regulations. As reported by the Honolulu Star-Advertiser, a significant portion of the funds, half the total, is designated for the football team. However, the lack of clarity regarding the allocation of the remaining funds has prompted a public dialogue on whether this plan contravenes the spirit of Title IX.
This concern stems from the potential for unequal distribution, where a disproportionate amount of the funding may benefit male athletes at the expense of their female counterparts. Title IX, a landmark federal law, prohibits sex-based discrimination in educational programs and activities that receive federal funding. This includes athletics, mandating equitable opportunities and resources for both genders.
The ramifications of this funding model extend beyond fairness. The NCAA and its member institutions are under increasing scrutiny to ensure that the distribution of funds relating to the players’ Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) does not create compliance problems with Title IX. The situation in Hawaii highlights a broader issue in college athletics: how to appropriately compensate athletes while upholding the principles of gender equity. Further examination will likely be necessary to ensure compliance with both federal and state law.
