Hawaii's 'Green Fee': Balancing Environmental Goals with Business Realities

·4 min read

Hawaii's recently enacted "green fee," a climate impact fee on tourists, is sparking debate within the business community. While intended to address environmental impacts, the increased tax on accommodations raises concerns about its impact on tourism, potentially affecting businesses throughout the state.

A vibrant aerial shot of surfers on colorful boards in turquoise waters, capturing Hawaiian surfing culture.
Photo by Jess Loiterton

Hawaii's business landscape is bracing for the implications of the newly enacted “green fee,” a climate impact fee levied on tourists through increased transient accommodations taxes. Governor Josh Green signed Bill 1396 into law, a move that aims to address the environmental impact of tourism by increasing the tax on hotel stays, cruise ship cabins, and short-term rentals. While the intent of this legislation is to protect Hawaii’s environment, as highlighted by Civil Beat's reporting, the impact on businesses and the overall economy is a subject of concern. The fee aims to generate funds for beach restoration and the removal of invasive species. However, the implementation and potential consequences are raising questions among entrepreneurs, investors, and professionals in the hospitality sector.

The increased tax, which will bring the overall rate to 14% for hotel and other accommodation stays, is expected to affect tourism spending. While some in the hotel industry support the initiative, as noted in a recent Star Advertiser article, they are also worried about the potential impact on visitor numbers. Jerry Gibson, president of the Hawaii Hotel Alliance, expressed concerns about the potential for Hawaii to become too expensive for tourists. This concern is shared by many in the hospitality sector as rising accommodation costs could lead visitors to spend less on other local experiences, such as dining and excursions, thus affecting a wide range of local businesses.

Critics of the green fee point to several potential shortcomings. Some worry that the increased cost of accommodations could deter tourists, leading them to choose other destinations with lower taxes. Others raise concerns about the practical application of the funds generated and whether they will be allocated efficiently to address environmental issues. The measure has garnered mixed reactions, with key members of the local hotel industry expressing support, as indicated by Civil Beat, while also preparing for challenges in maintaining visitor numbers. The University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization has also noted that the fee is unlikely to cause visitors to choose a different destination, but could affect spending overall.

As the green fee is implemented, Hawaii’s business community will need to adapt to these changes. The tourism sector must balance the need to support environmental initiatives with the imperative to maintain competitiveness. For investors and entrepreneurs, this means carefully evaluating the long-term implications of the fee on profitability and demand. The ability of Hawaii's businesses to innovate and offer compelling value propositions will be critical to navigate these challenges. Businesses related to tourism, such as transportation companies and retailers, will also need to be prepared for the changing dynamics of visitor spending. This fee represents a significant shift in how Hawaii approaches its environmental and economic goals.

Related Articles