Honolulu City Council Sparks Debate Over Selective Police Communication Access

·3 min read

A proposed measure before the Honolulu City Council is raising concerns about potential preferential treatment in the dissemination of public information from police communications, potentially hindering transparency and access for businesses and the public. The debate centers on the balance between public safety, media access, and the rights of all residents to receive timely information.

Female journalist reporting live from a crime scene with police and cameraman.
Photo by cottonbro studio

The Honolulu City Council is considering a measure, referred to as Bill 46, that has sparked controversy regarding access to police communications. Concerns are being raised that this might selectively grant information access to preferred media outlets, while excluding local social media and the general public. This situation is prompting discussions about transparency and the crucial role of timely information, especially during emergencies.

The debate over access to police communications isn't new in Honolulu. The Honolulu Police Department (HPD) encrypted its scanners in 2022, effectively limiting the public's and media's access to real-time information Hawaii Public Radio. This move has drawn criticism from news organizations and public advocates who argue that timely access to information is vital for keeping residents informed, especially during critical incidents.

Proponents of broader access to police communications emphasize the importance of real-time information for public safety. News outlets often serve as early warning systems, particularly in a geographically diverse state like Hawaii. Civil Beat points out that quick access to information can be a

Related Articles