Military Land Negotiations: A Critical Juncture for Hawaii's Future

·4 min read

Recent developments in the ongoing negotiations between the State of Hawaii and the U.S. military regarding expiring land leases highlight the critical need for transparency, community input, and a commitment to land restoration. Governor Josh Green's approach has drawn criticism, raising concerns about the future of these crucial negotiations and their impact on Hawaii's business landscape.

Various military aircraft displayed on a Hawaiian airport runway with a scenic backdrop.
Photo by Leah Newhouse

The future of significant portions of Hawaii's land hangs in the balance as the state navigates complex negotiations with the U.S. military regarding leases set to expire in 2029. In response to public demand for greater involvement, Governor Josh Green has adjusted the timeline for these critical discussions. However, recent events have cast a shadow over the process, raising concerns among stakeholders.

The Governor's recent communication with the U.S. Secretary of the Army, made without prior consultation with his own advisory committee, has sparked criticism. This advisory committee was specifically created to guide the complex negotiations, making the unilateral move a point of contention. OHA CEO Summer Sylva expressed "deep disappointment" in the Governor’s recent letter. Big Island Video News reported that this action undermines the trust, which is essential for any authentic advisory relationship. This lack of transparency and consultation jeopardizes the collaborative spirit necessary for achieving a beneficial outcome for the people of Hawaii.

Several factors necessitate a cautious and collaborative approach. Foremost is the need for a comprehensive accounting of the environmental and cultural impacts of past military activities on these lands. Restoring these lands to their original conditions and the people of Hawaii, must be a top priority. The state is seeking significant investments to clean up and remediate these lands, with a focus on Mākua Valley on Oʻahu.

The potential for the federal government to seize these lands through eminent domain looms large over these negotiations. This underscores the need for a carefully constructed framework that prioritizes the interests of Hawaii's residents. Green wants to secure $10 billion worth of investments from the federal government in exchange for Army lands. As Civil Beat reported, these investments could go towards transportation projects and housing for the residents. A negotiated settlement is the most efficient path forward. The state must leverage this opportunity to negotiate for the return of lands in good condition.

For Hawaii's business community, these negotiations hold significant implications. The future use of these lands, and the associated infrastructure, will directly shape development opportunities, investment possibilities, and the overall economic landscape of the islands. The decisions made in these negotiations will influence real estate development, tourism potential, and the long-term sustainability of Hawaii's resources.

Ultimately, the success of these negotiations will depend on the State's commitment to transparency, community engagement, and a firm stance on the restoration and thoughtful return of military lands. Failure to do so risks not only environmental and cultural damage, but also opportunities for Hawaii's entrepreneurs, investors, and professionals.

Related Articles